Dangerous Doctrines of Darwin

Darwinism tells us that we as humans came from animals, that species can change kinds, women are inferior, and some races are inferior. In addition, I believe Darwinism is responsible for the Nazi doctrine that the Aryan race was supreme and they needed to restore the pure Aryan bloodline to filter out the weak genes. This led to a massive slaughter of Jews and people with disabilities.

---------

Darwin - Evolution

Darwinism teaches us that organisms change over time and adapt to their environment.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.livescience.com/amp/474-controversy-evolution-works.html

"The theory of evolution by natural selection, first formulated in Darwin's book "On the Origin of Species" in 1859, is the process by which organisms change over time as a result of changes in heritable physical or behavioral traits. Changes that allow an organism to better adapt to its environment will help it survive and have more offspring."

While that may be true in part, I believe God allows a species to make adaptations within their own kind. For instance, the beak of a Finch adapting does not mean that a Finch changed kinds, it is still a Finch. God allows our bodies to adapt to certain environments, but we do not change species. In fact, there is no proof of a class species change.

Ray Comfort of Living Waters gives us a great video showing the lack of evidence on behalf of the academic society to support their theory of evolution:

Evolution Vs. God

https://youtu.be/U0u3-2CGOMQ

We know that the Bible says God created animals as different from man, who was made in the image of God. God then gave man dominion and rule over the animals:

Genesis 1:21-28 KJV - And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good. [22] And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth. [23] And the evening and the morning were the fifth day. [24] And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so. [25] And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good. [26] And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. [27] So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. [28] And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

This teaching of Evolution undermines the truth of the Bible and brainwashed our children with misleading theories.

https://www.christiancourier.com/articles/306-those-missing-links

In addition, there is no archeological evidence, as in fossil records, to show the transition of one species (kind) to another:

"It is generally argued that biological change (resulting in new kinds of organisms) is the consequence of random genetic mutations, working in concert with natural selection.

Mutations are accidental alterations of the genetic code in a cell. Natural selection is supposed to be nature’s sorting mechanism. Those creatures with qualities best adapted for survival do survive, while the weaker are eliminated.

Gradually, it is alleged, sufficient change is generated to effect a new type of biological organism. Fish change into amphibians, amphibians into reptiles; reptiles evolve into birds, and birds eventually produce mammals.

Of course, if this scenario did occur, there is a perfectly good way to check it out. Look at the record that has been left by the fossil deposits in the various strata of the earth. Water deposits in the ancient past have left millions of fossils (chemically formed duplications of living creatures) in a veritable geologic library.

But what has the fossil evidence revealed? Certainly not proof for the evolutionary concept. To the contrary, the fossil testimony suggests that the major forms of biological life stand abruptly apart. The thousands of intermediate links bridging these huge gaps are conspicuously absent.

This has baffled evolutionary apologists. Charles Darwin confessed that this absence of transitional fossils is “the most serious objection which can be urged against the theory” (1859, 313)."

---------

Darwin - Inferiority of Women

Ironically, the liberal group who supports darwinism as the basis of their anti-God religion of evolution also support the feminism movement. Many liberal women hate men who say women are inferior, yet Darwin himself wrote this idea in Part 3, Chapter 19, of The Descent of Man.

https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Descent_of_Man_(Darwin)/Chapter_XIX

"The chief distinction in the intellectual powers of the two sexes is shewn by man's attaining to a higher eminence, in whatever he takes up, than can woman—whether requiring deep thought, reason, or imagination, or merely the use of the senses and hands. If two lists were made of the most eminent men and women in poetry, painting, sculpture, music (inclusive both of composition and performance), history, science, and philosophy, with half-a-dozen names under each subject, the two lists would not bear comparison. We may also infer, from the law of the deviation from averages, so well illustrated by Mr. Galton, in his work on 'Hereditary Genius,' that if men are capable of a decided pre-eminence over women in many subjects, the average of mental power in man must be above that of woman."

While, the Bible does say that women are the weaker vessel, I believe that means in terms of being decieved by Satan:

1 Peter 3:7 KJV - Likewise, ye husbands, dwell with them according to knowledge, giving honour unto the wife, as unto the weaker vessel, and as being heirs together of the grace of life; that your prayers be not hindered.

1 Timothy 2:11-14 KJV - Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. [12] But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. [13] For Adam was first formed, then Eve. [14] And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.

Living Waters - Evolution

https://youtu.be/g1pVt623_6w

---------

Darwin - Favoured Races

Darwinism tells us that black people are less evolved as whites.

https://answersingenesis.org/charles-darwin/racism/did-darwin-promote-racism/

"The full title of Darwin’s most famous work included some stark words: On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. Darwin envisioned the spontaneous formation of simple life evolving into higher forms through the pitiless forces of nature selecting the fittest.

Darwin demonstrated how he believed evolution shaped man in his subsequent book The Descent of Man. In it, he theorized that man, having evolved from apes, had continued evolving as various races, with some races more developed than others. Darwin classified his own white race as more advanced than those “lower organisms” such as pygmies, and he called different people groups “savage,” “low,” and “degraded.”

Darwin wasn’t the first to propose biological arguments for racism, but his works fueled the most ugly and deadly racism. Even evolutionist Stephen Jay Gould wrote, “Biological arguments for racism may have been common before 1859, but they increased by orders of magnitude following the acceptance of evolutionary theory” (Ontogeny and Phylogeny, 1977)."

We read in the Descent of Man, Chapter 20, that Darwin calls the Africans "savages."

https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Descent_of_Man_(Darwin)/Chapter_XX

"The late Sir. A. Smith, who had travelled widely in S. Africa, and knew much about the habits of savages there and elsewhere, expressed to me the strongest opinion that no race exists in which woman is considered as the property of the community."

I believe this line of thinking helped shape the doctrine of Hitler, in that the Aryan race was superior and lower races like Jews and Gypsies needed to be eliminated for the best specie to progress.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.history.com/.amp/topics/germany/eugenics

"As horrific as forced sterilization in America was, nothing compared to Adolf Hitler’s eugenic experiments leading up to and during World War II. And Hitler didn’t come up with the concept of a superior Aryan race all on his own. In fact, he referred to American eugenics in his 1934 book, Mein Kampf.

In Mein Kampf, Hitler declares non-Aryan races such as Jews and gypsies as inferior. He believed Germans should do everything possible, including genocide, to make sure their gene pool stayed pure. And in 1933, the Nazis created the Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring which resulted in thousands of forced sterilizations.

By 1940, Hitler’s master-race mania took a terrible turn as Germans with mental or physical disabilities were euthanized by gas or lethal injection. Even the blind and deaf weren’t safe, and hundreds of thousands of people were killed."

We see that what we believe can have very dangerous results. Due to Hitler believing his race was superior, he slaughtered millions of innocent people and tortured them in concentration camps.

Jesus told us to love our neighbor as ourselves, even if they have a different skin color. That is His standard of morality to prevent evil.

---------

Darwinian Thugs

In August 2019, an article headline reads"

"Prolific Yale professor turns against Darwinism, warns Darwinians ‘will destroy you if you challenge’ the theory"

The Darwinian stronghold is quite strong in the current educational curriculum. Challenging it could mean alienation, defamation of character, and even losing your job. This is because Satan is the god of this world, and the minds of the people are blinded by his lies. The article goes on to read:

David Gelernter, prominent writer and Yale University professor, believes it's high time for people to drop Charles Darwin's outdated theory of evolution.

What are the details?

In a recent essay published in the Claremont Review of Books, Gelernter wrote, "Darwin has failed," and insisted that scientists move past Darwin and his theories altogether.

Gelernter, who has been a proponent of Darwinism since childhood, argued that the longstanding theory of evolution simply doesn't give a thorough enough explanation of, perhaps, the most important component of modern science: the actual origin of species.

According to the essay, titled "Giving up Darwin," the Cambrian explosion, as well as modern discoveries in molecular biology, have dashed Darwin's theories of evolution as he understood it to occur.

"Most species enter the evolutionary order fully formed and then depart unchanged," Gelernter wrote. "The incremental development of new species is largely not there."

He also added that he feels it is important not to discount the theory of intelligent design, which is an equally important concept as Darwinism has been to science.

"Darwin's theory predicts that new life forms evolve gradually from old ones in a constantly branching, spreading tree of life," he wrote. "Those brave new Cambrian creatures must therefore have had Precambrian predecessors, similar but not quite as fancy and sophisticated. They could not have all blown out suddenly, like a bunch of geysers."

He pointed out that the concept of intelligent design is not necessarily his favorite theory, but insists that it is an "absolutely serious argument," pointing out that the theory is the very "first, and obviously most intuitive that comes to mind."

What else?

In June, Gelernter said that Darwinian scientists will absolutely "destroy" those people who dare try to diminish its importance to science.

"I have to distinguish between the way I've been treated personally, which has been a very courteous and collegial way by my colleagues at Yale, they're nice guys and I like them, they're my friends," he said in June remarks. "On the other hand, when I look at their intellectual behavior, what they publish, and, much more important, what they tell their students, Darwinism has indeed passed beyond a scientific argument."

"As far as they are concerned, take your life in your hands to challenge it intellectually," he continued. "They will destroy you if you challenge it."

"[I haven't seen anything] approaching free speech on this topic," Gelernter admitted. "It's a bitter rejection, not just — a sort of bitter, fundamental, angry, outraged, violent rejection, which comes nowhere near scientific of intellectual discussion. I've seen that happen again and again. 'I'm a Darwinist, don't you say a word against it, or, I don't wanna hear it, period.'"

"I am attacking their religion," he concluded. "It is a big issue for them."

https://www.theblaze.com/news/prolific-yale-professor-turns-against-darwinism?utm_content=buffer553b3&utm_medium=organic&utm_source=facebook&utm_campaign=fb-allieonblazetv

-------

Intelligent Design - Phi Ratio 

For an interesting article on Intelligent Design and the Phi Ratio found throughout many created animals, plants, humans, etc., please see this website:

• Intelligent Design Codes

This repeating and very specific pattern all throughout creation shows us that there was one intelligent designer throughout.


Please see some of these other disciple resources:

• Who is Jesus?
• Disciple of Jesus?
• Spiritual Warfare
• Religion or Relationship?
• Want to Be Saved?
• A New Creature
• Grace Alone By Faith Alone?
• Not Under the Law
• God or Money?
• Unplug
• Interfaith Movement
• Identity of God
• The Church
• The Narrow Way
• Run the Race - Overcome!
• Spotless Bride
• Is Satan Real?